tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7696335.post109237247474633753..comments2020-06-13T03:22:05.789-04:00Comments on The New Skeptic: Now, I’m No Conspiracy Nut...Vernunfthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16652751092085432868noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7696335.post-1092373082075199892004-08-13T00:58:00.000-04:002004-08-13T00:58:00.000-04:00McGreevey will get away with it. People really thi...McGreevey will get away with it. People really think that a political office holder's sexuality is an issue; unfortunately, I am cursed with decency and quite frankly don't want to know whether you give or receive, so to speak. The real issue, if this was not an elaborate ploy by the Democrats (I see Clintonian hands in this mess - they were always wonderful at erecting such a facade of lies that one hardly knew whether to believe that two and two made four, if it came from Bill Clinton's mouth), was McGreevey's pending sexual harrassment suit.<br /><br />Of course, sexual harrassment was what Clinton-Lewinsky was all about, not Ken Starr's Puritan witchhunt to expose private sexual conduct, nor even Clinton's perjury (after all, before he perjured himself, he had already sexually harrassed Miss Lewinsky; people seem to think it was "ok" to lie under oath because the questions he was asked dealt with private matters the public had no right to know - yes, we never had any right to know our President [illegally] abused his employee).<br /><br />I'm parentheses-crazy today. Moreso than usual, which is saying something.Vernunfthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652751092085432868noreply@blogger.com